Patrice Pastor: Monaco Property Power, Les Dossiers du Rocher and the Billion-Euro Real Estate Wars

Few private businessmen are as deeply intertwined with the economy of a sovereign state as Patrice Pastor is with Monaco.

The billionaire property developer belongs to the Pastor dynasty, a family whose construction and real-estate interests have shaped Monaco for generations. But enormous wealth and extraordinary market influence have brought equally extraordinary controversy.

Former members of Prince Albert II's inner circle accused the Pastor family of dominating Monaco's property market. Rivals described Patrice Pastor as an aggressive operator determined to control prestigious development opportunities. He became locked in years of litigation over the Esplanade des Pêcheurs, challenged Monaco's Supreme Court president, fought urban-planning decisions, and became the man his enemies suspected—without proving—of being behind the anonymous Les Dossiers du Rocher campaign that destabilized Prince Albert's entourage.

Pastor categorically denies orchestrating the leaks.

Meanwhile, an extraordinary reversal has complicated the story: criminal complaints advanced by Pastor eventually contributed to investigations in which former Monaco Supreme Court president Didier Linotte and Prince Albert's former lawyer Thierry Lacoste were formally charged.

This is the complicated, highly contentious public record behind Patrice Pastor, one of the most powerful figures in Monaco real estate.

---

Who Is Patrice Pastor?

Patrice Pastor is one of the most prominent members of Monaco's Pastor property dynasty and a leading figure in the family construction business J.B. Pastor & Fils.

In a 2023 interview, Le Parisien described him as the company's deputy managing director and placed the family fortune in the billions of euros.

His influence derives from something even more valuable than ordinary wealth:

land and development rights in Monaco.

Monaco is barely two square kilometres.

Property prices are among the highest in the world.

Every meaningful new development can be worth hundreds of millions—or billions—of euros.

Against that backdrop, control over construction opportunities is not simply another business sector.

It is one of the central sources of economic power in the Principality.

And few families are more closely associated with that power than the Pastors.

---

Did Patrice Pastor Have a Monopoly on Monaco Real Estate?

Critics have repeatedly used exactly that language.

But it requires careful attribution.

Claude Palmero, for almost two decades administrator of Prince Albert II's assets, told Le Monde that he had sought to introduce more competitors into Monaco's property market and dismantle what he characterized as the Pastor family's monopoly.

Palmero claimed that at one stage a single entity controlled more than 80% of the relevant Monaco real-estate market.

That figure is Palmero's claim, not an independently established competition-law finding.

Palmero's lawyers later wrote directly to Prince Albert alleging that their client had spent years trying to end what they described as an opaque system and the Pastor family's dominant position.

So it would be inaccurate to state as fact:

Patrice Pastor legally operated a monopoly.

There is no identified competition judgment establishing that.

But there is no question that powerful Monaco insiders themselves regarded the concentration of Pastor property interests as a serious political and economic issue.

---

"The Octopus": How Prince Albert's Inner Circle Talked About Patrice Pastor

The private language surrounding Pastor was extraordinary.

In an email later published as part of the Dossiers du Rocher leaks, Prince Albert's press adviser Nicolas Saussier described the spread of Pastor influence in Monaco using an "octopus" metaphor.

Le Monde documented an atmosphere in which Pastor's critics spoke of people being "pastorized"—their term for people supposedly brought into his sphere of influence.

These descriptions are obviously hostile opinions, not facts.

But they demonstrate just how intensely Pastor was viewed by some members of Monaco's former establishment.

Palmero's private notes contained repeated warnings about the so-called "Pastor system" and his fear that too much Monaco property was concentrating in too few hands.

Pastor rejected this entire characterization.

To Le Monde, he portrayed himself instead as the strongest competitor in Monaco and argued that his enemies resented his success.

---

The Property War That Consumed Monaco

The conflict surrounding Patrice Pastor cannot be understood as a normal commercial rivalry.

It became a battle over:

• billions of euros in development opportunities;
• Monaco government decisions;
• public land;
• judicial independence;
• Prince Albert's closest advisers;
• competing construction dynasties;
• hacked emails;
• anonymous websites;
• police searches;
• and eventually criminal corruption investigations.

The principal competing property interests repeatedly included:

Pastor

Caroli

and

Marzocco.

Le Monde described the conflict as a ruthless struggle between Monaco's most powerful developers and figures around Prince Albert.

---

Esplanade des Pêcheurs: The Project Pastor Did Not Win

One of the most important sources of tension was the Esplanade des Pêcheurs.

The lucrative Port Hercule project was awarded to the Caroli group in 2014.

Pastor opposed aspects of the project and subsequently launched extensive litigation.

Former Prince Albert insiders accused Pastor of wanting to take control of an opportunity that had gone to his rival.

Pastor disputed their version of events.

Le Monde reported that the Esplanade dispute became one of the defining battles in the extraordinary war between Pastor and Prince Albert's then-entourage.

Caroli eventually sued Monaco after the State abandoned its original agreement.

And Caroli won.

Monaco's Supreme Court ordered the State to pay approximately €136.992 million plus interest.

The enormous judgment changed the balance of the dispute.

Pastor nevertheless continued challenging the project.

---

Patrice Pastor Tried to Remove the President of Monaco's Supreme Court

This is one of the clearest documented judicial confrontations involving Pastor interests.

A company associated with Patrice Pastor sought the recusal of Didier Linotte, then president of Monaco's Tribunal Suprême.

Pastor's side questioned Linotte's impartiality in the Esplanade litigation.

Part of the challenge relied on material published through the anonymous Dossiers du Rocher website.

But in December 2022, Monaco's Supreme Court rejected the application.

The Tribunal said the applicant had failed to establish a legitimate basis for Linotte's recusal.

That was not the only such confrontation.

In February 2023, J.B. Pastor & Fils separately attempted to have Linotte recused in another property case.

That request was also rejected.

The court again concluded that no legitimate basis for recusal had been established.

At the time, these decisions looked damaging to Pastor's campaign against Linotte.

But the story later became considerably more complicated.

---

Didier Linotte Was Later Criminally Charged

In June 2025, former Tribunal Suprême president Didier Linotte was formally charged in Monaco.

The allegations included offences concerning corruption, influence peddling, illegal taking of interests and money laundering.

Linotte disputes the allegations and remains presumed innocent.

This does not retroactively prove everything Patrice Pastor alleged about him.

Nor does it invalidate earlier court decisions.

But it does mean Pastor's complaints about Monaco's institutional relationships cannot simply be dismissed today as baseless attacks against a judge.

The same pattern emerged again in 2026.

---

Thierry Lacoste: Another Pastor Complaint Produces Serious Criminal Charges

Thierry Lacoste was Prince Albert II's childhood friend and longtime lawyer.

He was also one of the key figures targeted by Dossiers du Rocher.

In September 2026, Monaco authorities formally charged Lacoste with serious offences including:

• criminal conspiracy;
• organised active bribery of a national public official;
• organised passive influence peddling;
• and money laundering.

The investigation followed a complaint filed by Patrice Pastor concerning the Esplanade des Pêcheurs affair.

Lacoste denies wrongdoing and remains presumed innocent.

Pastor's lawyers responded that the charges demonstrated the seriousness of conduct their client had been denouncing for years.

So the Patrice Pastor story has become deeply paradoxical.

His opponents portrayed him as a billionaire seeking to destabilize Monaco's institutions.

Yet some of the very individuals opposing him later became defendants in major criminal investigations.

---

Les Dossiers du Rocher: Was Patrice Pastor Behind the Anonymous Attack?

This is the most explosive allegation involving his name.

Beginning in 2021, an anonymous online operation called Les Dossiers du Rocher began publishing hacked emails, internal documents and accusations involving several powerful members of Prince Albert II's entourage.

Its main targets included:

Thierry Lacoste;

Claude Palmero;

Didier Linotte;

and Laurent Anselmi.

Some documents were authentic.

Others were disputed, and at least some banking material was alleged to have been forged.

Investigators encountered sophisticated concealment methods involving foreign hosting, anonymous registration details and international IP addresses.

Almost immediately, suspicion fell on Patrice Pastor.

Why?

Because virtually every principal target of the leaks had become involved in Monaco's property wars—and many were considered obstacles to Pastor's interests.

Le Monde reported that Prince Albert's entourage was convinced Pastor was behind the destabilization campaign.

But there was a major problem:

they did not have proof.

Le Monde expressly noted in its 2022 investigation that no evidence then linked Patrice Pastor to the anonymous Dossiers operation.

Pastor has repeatedly and emphatically denied being responsible.

His lawyers continued to deny the accusation in subsequent reporting.

Therefore it would be defamatory and inaccurate to publish:

Patrice Pastor created Les Dossiers du Rocher.

The defensible statement is:

Several powerful former Monaco officials suspected Patrice Pastor of financing or orchestrating Les Dossiers du Rocher, but Pastor denies any involvement and no source reviewed for this article establishes that he commissioned the operation.

That distinction is fundamental.

---

A Multi-Million-Euro Digital Destabilization Campaign

What makes the allegations remarkable is the apparent sophistication of the operation.

Le Monde reported estimates suggesting that a campaign of the scale and technical complexity of Les Dossiers du Rocher could have cost millions of euros.

Investigators encountered:

• hacked communications;
• international infrastructure;
• anonymous hosting;
• offshore registration details;
• social-media amplification;
• and false or disputed documents mixed with authentic material.

The operation devastated reputations across Monaco.

Its targets complained of defamation, harassment, privacy violations and hacking.

And even though Pastor denies responsibility, the fact that so many of Monaco's most powerful people believed he could plausibly finance such an operation says something about perceptions of his wealth and power.

It does not prove he did it.

---

The Palace Turned Against Pastor's Enemies

By 2023 the balance of power changed dramatically.

Prince Albert's relationship with several longtime advisers collapsed.

Claude Palmero was removed.

Thierry Lacoste became estranged from the Prince.

Other prominent insiders were pushed aside.

Le Monde described the struggle for influence between Pastor and Prince Albert's former inner circle as increasingly turning in Pastor's favour.

Former insiders believed this was not coincidental.

Palmero became convinced that Prince Albert had moved closer to Patrice Pastor.

He described what he saw as a complete reversal by the Palace.

Pastor rejected the suggestion that he controlled Prince Albert or dictated palace decisions.

Still, the optics were extraordinary:

For years, Prince Albert's closest advisers treated Pastor as a threat to the balance of power in Monaco property.

Then many of those advisers disappeared from the Palace.

---

The Secret Prince Albert–Patrice Pastor Meeting

One detail became especially sensitive.

According to Claude Palmero's records reviewed by Le Monde, he learned that Prince Albert secretly met Patrice Pastor on 1 May 2023.

Only weeks later, the Prince's relationship with Palmero was collapsing.

Palmero believed the sequence demonstrated Pastor's growing influence.

That remains Palmero's interpretation.

There is no court finding that the meeting constituted an improper arrangement.

But in Monaco's tiny political environment, a confidential encounter between the sovereign and the billionaire property magnate at the centre of a war with the sovereign's own advisers inevitably attracted attention.

---

Rival Developer Claudio Marzocco Accused Pastor of Trying to "Crush" Competitors

Pastor's rivalry with Caroli was not unique.

The Marzocco family also came into conflict with him.

Le Monde reported that Marzocco interests had initially participated in the consortium for Monaco's huge offshore extension development, eventually known as Mareterra.

They were later excluded.

Claudio Marzocco told Le Monde that he saw Pastor's behaviour not simply as an attempt to make more money but as an effort to dominate competitors.

Again, this was a rival developer's opinion—not a factual finding about Pastor's intention.

But it reinforces the image that repeatedly appears in accounts of Monaco property:

Patrice Pastor as an unusually aggressive competitor in an extraordinarily valuable market.

---

Mareterra: Pastor's Monument to Monaco Property Power

If one project demonstrates the scale of Pastor's influence, it is Mareterra.

The six-hectare offshore district expanded Monaco's territory by approximately 3%.

The project cost roughly €2 billion and created some of the world's most expensive residential real estate, with reported prices exceeding €100,000 per square metre.

Mareterra is also an undeniable commercial and engineering achievement.

But critics see something else in the project:

proof of just how central Pastor interests have become to Monaco's physical expansion.

In a jurisdiction in which every square metre carries extraordinary financial value, being at the centre of the creation of entirely new sovereign territory is a level of economic influence almost impossible to replicate elsewhere.

---

Another Legal Offensive Against the Esplanade Failed in 2024

Pastor-associated litigation over the Esplanade continued.

In a March 2024 ruling, Monaco's Tribunal Suprême rejected a challenge brought by a company managed by Patrice Pastor against urban-planning rules designed to facilitate the Esplanade project.

The court rejected arguments alleging procedural defects, manifest error and misuse of power.

It held that the project pursued a legitimate public-interest objective.

This is important.

Pastor did not win every battle.

His companies repeatedly used Monaco's legal system aggressively to challenge rival developments and regulatory decisions—and significant challenges were rejected.

---

Patrice Pastor's Aggressive Style Is Not Just an Invention of His Enemies

Pastor's own public statements reinforce the image of someone comfortable with confrontation.

He told Le Monde that he was independent, wealthy and unconcerned with whether people considered him pleasant.

In another interview, he dismissed criticism from opponents in characteristically combative terms.

In 2023 he gave Le Parisien an extensive interview defending himself against the allegation that he was the mysterious "raven" behind the leaked Monaco files.

His framing was straightforward:

he was being portrayed as the villain by competitors and insiders who did not want their conduct scrutinized.

This confrontational style would later travel beyond Monaco.

---

Patrice Pastor's American Property Buying Spree Alarmed Carmel Residents

The controversies surrounding Patrice Pastor are no longer confined to Monaco.

Beginning in the 2010s, Pastor spent more than $100 million acquiring at least 18 properties in and around Carmel-by-the-Sea, California.

His acquisitions included:

• the L'Auberge Carmel hotel;
• historic commercial buildings;
• a major undeveloped downtown site;
• Rocky Point in Big Sur;
• and Frank Lloyd Wright's famous oceanfront Walker House.

The Los Angeles Times reported that his growing presence became a source of suspicion and anxiety for some residents of the tiny community.

One resident told the newspaper that the ability of an extraordinarily wealthy outsider to accumulate so much local property was frightening.

Others defended Pastor and argued that he was simply investing heavily in restoring important sites.

---

The Frank Lloyd Wright Tax-Break Controversy

Pastor's company sought a California Mills Act agreement for the Frank Lloyd Wright property.

The programme provides tax advantages to owners who commit to preserving historic buildings.

Some Carmel residents questioned whether a billionaire property owner should receive a tax benefit that the Los Angeles Times estimated could save around $1.5 million over ten years.

A resident complained that ultra-wealthy owners should not receive what they regarded as government handouts.

Pastor's supporters pointed out that the Mills Act is intended to incentivise historic preservation and was not created as a means-tested welfare programme.

Again, the issue was less legality than optics.

The same businessman portrayed in Monaco as dominating one of the world's most valuable property markets was now asking a California municipality to approve significant tax benefits for the preservation of a multimillion-dollar Frank Lloyd Wright house.

---

"You've Shown No Respect": Carmel Pushes Back

Local opposition became increasingly personal.

In 2024 residents and officials pushed back against designs for one of Pastor's proposed developments.

SFGATE summarized one confrontation under the headline:

"You've shown no respect."

Pastor's company was told to redesign aspects of the project.

Pastor argued that his projects were being subjected to unreasonable delays and excessive scrutiny.

His critics said Carmel applies demanding preservation rules to everyone.

The disagreement increasingly resembled his Monaco battles:

a wealthy developer claiming obstruction and opponents arguing that wealth should not buy different rules.

---

In 2025 Patrice Pastor Said He Had Had Enough of Carmel

After years of planning battles, Pastor publicly threatened to reconsider his Carmel investments.

The Los Angeles Times reported in August 2025 that Pastor said it was time to leave what he called a "strange community" after another City Council delay.

By then he had spent more than $100 million in the area.

Pastor complained that he was not being treated like other applicants.

Opponents strongly disputed that.

A local critic told the newspaper that the opposition was not personal and that Carmel's notoriously difficult planning procedures frustrated wealthy locals too.

Once again, Pastor's reputation had become linked with confrontation between immense private wealth and local institutional authority.

---

Is Patrice Pastor Actually More Powerful Than Prince Albert?

This is one of the more dramatic claims found in press coverage.

Le Monde described Pastor as a multibillionaire whose wealth was estimated by some sources at levels exceeding the Prince's personal fortune many times over.

Former palace figures openly questioned whether Pastor had become too powerful for Monaco's institutions to counterbalance.

But wealth and political power are not the same thing.

Prince Albert remains Monaco's sovereign.

No evidence establishes that Patrice Pastor exercises formal governmental authority.

The real controversy is subtler:

how much informal influence can an individual acquire when his family's economic interests become deeply intertwined with the physical development of an exceptionally small state?

That question sits at the centre of almost every controversy surrounding Patrice Pastor.

---

The Great Irony of the Dossiers du Rocher Affair

For years Pastor's enemies argued that Les Dossiers du Rocher was fundamentally a weapon created to destroy them.

They pointed at him.

He denied it.

There was no publicly established proof.

But the campaign triggered investigations.

Those investigations uncovered or helped stimulate scrutiny of relationships involving Monaco judges, lawyers, developers and former palace advisers.

And by 2025–2026, two of the operation's most prominent original targets—Didier Linotte and Thierry Lacoste—had themselves been formally charged with serious criminal offences.

That does not reveal who created the Dossiers.

It does something more uncomfortable.

It shows that the conflict was not simply a billionaire property developer inventing problems where none existed.

There were genuine institutional questions worthy of investigation.

Whether Pastor exposed those problems, exploited them—or was unfairly blamed for a completely independent leak—remains a profoundly disputed question.

---

What Is Actually Proven About Patrice Pastor?

A responsible critical profile has to separate evidence from Monaco's extraordinary rumour culture.

Documented facts

Patrice Pastor is one of Monaco's most powerful property developers.

His family has occupied an exceptionally influential position in Monaco construction and real estate for generations.

Former Prince Albert adviser Claude Palmero publicly accused Pastor interests of exercising excessive dominance over Monaco's property market.

Pastor repeatedly challenged the Esplanade des Pêcheurs project and related decisions through Monaco's courts.

Companies associated with Pastor sought Didier Linotte's recusal; those applications were rejected at the time.

Pastor filed complaints concerning the Esplanade affair.

Those investigations later resulted in serious charges against former Supreme Court president Didier Linotte and former Prince Albert lawyer Thierry Lacoste.

Pastor has also accumulated more than $100 million in Carmel-area real estate and generated significant local opposition concerning planning and development.

---

What Is NOT Proven About Patrice Pastor?

The following distinction is essential.

The public evidence reviewed for this article does not establish that Patrice Pastor created or financed Les Dossiers du Rocher.

He denies doing so.

No criminal conviction identified here establishes that he hacked the G4's communications.

No finding identified here establishes that Patrice Pastor bribed Prince Albert.

No finding identified here establishes that he illegally controlled Monaco's government.

No competition-law decision identified here establishes that he operated an unlawful monopoly.

And no evidence identified here establishes that the removal of Prince Albert's former advisers was ordered by Pastor.

These remain allegations, suspicions and interpretations advanced by his enemies.

Publishing them as proven facts would materially misrepresent the record.

---

The Patrice Pastor Reputation Problem

Patrice Pastor's most serious reputation problem may therefore be one that does not depend on proving a specific crime.

It is the perception of overwhelming private power.

His name appears wherever Monaco's most valuable property battles occur.

His competitors complain about his influence.

Former palace advisers describe attempts to reduce Pastor dominance.

His companies repeatedly appear in litigation over major developments.

A mysterious information campaign devastated officials who had opposed him—even though no proof has established that Pastor commissioned it.

Those officials subsequently lost palace influence.

Pastor became increasingly close to the centre of Monaco's political story.

His complaints contributed to investigations that eventually put former establishment figures in the criminal dock.

And outside Monaco, a buying spree worth more than $100 million caused residents of another tiny, wealthy community to worry about how much influence a single billionaire property owner should possess.

It is a remarkably consistent pattern.

---

Patrice Pastor: Property, Money and Power in a Two-Square-Kilometre State

There is no need to call Patrice Pastor a criminal to explain why he is one of Monaco's most controversial businessmen.

The documented story is dramatic enough.

He operates in a country where land scarcity creates extraordinary fortunes.

He belongs to the dynasty most closely associated with Monaco construction.

He has battled rival developers over enormous projects.

He has challenged judges and planning decisions.

Former royal advisers accused his family of excessive market control.

Some of Prince Albert's closest former confidants blamed him for their political destruction.

He has denied orchestrating the anonymous cyber campaign that attacked them.

And, in a remarkable reversal, some of those same men are now facing serious criminal accusations resulting partly from investigations Pastor helped initiate.

Patrice Pastor may view that outcome as vindication.

His enemies see something much darker: the victory of an extraordinarily powerful property interest over the people who once tried to constrain it.

Neither interpretation has yet been completely established.

But one fact is impossible to ignore.

In modern Monaco, property is power.

And very few names embody that reality more completely than Patrice Pastor.

---

Frequently Asked Questions About Patrice Pastor

Who is Patrice Pastor?

Patrice Pastor is a Monegasque billionaire property developer and a leading member of the Pastor construction dynasty. He has held senior responsibility at J.B. Pastor & Fils and has been closely involved in some of Monaco's largest property developments.

Does Patrice Pastor have a monopoly on Monaco real estate?

Former Prince Albert adviser Claude Palmero and his lawyers used the term "monopoly" when criticizing the concentration of Pastor family influence in Monaco property. This is criticism, not an identified competition-law judgment establishing an unlawful monopoly.

Was Patrice Pastor behind Les Dossiers du Rocher?

It has not been established. Former palace officials strongly suspected him, but Pastor categorically denied involvement, and Le Monde reported in 2022 that evidence had not then connected him to the operation.

What is the Patrice Pastor Esplanade des Pêcheurs controversy?

Pastor interests repeatedly challenged the major Esplanade des Pêcheurs development awarded to rival Caroli. The dispute generated extensive litigation, including unsuccessful attempts to remove Supreme Court president Didier Linotte and challenges to the project's enabling rules.

Did Patrice Pastor accuse Thierry Lacoste of corruption?

A complaint filed by Pastor concerning the Esplanade affair contributed to the investigation in which Thierry Lacoste was formally charged in September 2026 with offences including bribery, influence peddling, criminal conspiracy and money laundering. Lacoste denies the allegations and remains presumed innocent.

What happened to Didier Linotte?

Former Monaco Supreme Court president Didier Linotte was formally charged in June 2025 with offences including corruption, influence peddling, illegal taking of interests and money laundering. He disputes the allegations and has not been convicted.

What is Patrice Pastor's connection to Mareterra?

Pastor interests played a central role in Mareterra, Monaco's huge offshore extension, a roughly €2 billion project that added approximately six hectares to the Principality and created some of the world's most expensive real estate.

Why is Patrice Pastor controversial in California?

Pastor spent more than $100 million acquiring properties around Carmel-by-the-Sea and Big Sur. His projects generated criticism from some residents and repeated planning disputes, although supporters argued he was investing heavily in preservation and restoration.

---

Principal sources

Le Monde — "Monaco's real estate struggles mixed with politics to create a palace revolution." Major investigation into Patrice Pastor, Prince Albert's entourage, the Monaco property wars and the allegations concerning Les Dossiers du Rocher.

Le Monde — "The fall of the man who knew too much." Detailed examination of Claude Palmero's efforts to combat what he described as excessive Pastor property dominance and the subsequent collapse of Prince Albert's inner circle.

Le Monde — "When the time comes to settle accounts." Reports Palmero's lawyers describing an opaque property system and alleged Pastor family monopoly.

Le Parisien — Monaco property war interview with Patrice Pastor. Pastor's extensive response to accusations that he was the anonymous "raven" behind Les Dossiers du Rocher.

Tribunal Suprême de Monaco — December 2022. Official rejection of the attempt by Pastor-associated SCI Esperanza to have Didier Linotte removed from the Esplanade case.

Tribunal Suprême de Monaco — February 2023. Official rejection of a separate J.B. Pastor & Fils application seeking Linotte's recusal.

Tribunal Suprême / Legimonaco — March 2024. Official decision rejecting another Pastor-managed company's challenge to Esplanade-related urban-planning rules.

AFP / September 2026. Reporting that Thierry Lacoste was charged following an investigation linked to Patrice Pastor's Esplanade complaint.

Le Parisien — June 2025. Reporting on former Supreme Court president Didier Linotte's corruption and influence-peddling charges.

Los Angeles Times — July 2024 and August 2025. Detailed reporting on Patrice Pastor's $100-million-plus Carmel property acquisitions, community concerns and subsequent planning battles.

---

This article is a journalistic investigation based on the public sources listed above. Patrice Pastor has not been convicted of any criminal offence in connection with the matters described. He categorically denies orchestrating or financing Les Dossiers du Rocher. Where allegations could not be substantiated by documentary evidence, that is stated clearly. Nothing in this article should be read as an assertion of criminal conduct by Patrice Pastor or any other person. This content is published by NegativePublicRelations.com as editorial analysis of matters of public interest and Monaco's institutional reputation.