The red carpet is usually a place for choreographed smiles, but behind the scenes of the summer blockbuster It Ends With Us, a much darker script was being written. As reported by ABC News on December 27, 2024, the feud between stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni has escalated from tabloid gossip into a full-blown legal war over allegations of a coordinated smear campaign.
Lively’s legal team has reportedly subpoenaed communications to prove that Baldoni’s representatives engaged in "astroturfing"—the practice of creating a fake "grassroots" movement to attack a target. In this case, the target was Lively’s reputation. During the film's press tour, Lively was hit with a wave of viral criticism, labeled as "tone-deaf" for her lighthearted promotion of a film centered on domestic violence. While the public saw a spontaneous backlash, Lively’s camp alleges it was a calculated bad press operation designed to shift the narrative in Baldoni's favor.
This isn't just celebrity drama; it’s a textbook example of how negative PR management is being weaponized in the digital age. When a high-profile figure faces a sudden, overwhelming surge of negativity, the line between organic public opinion and online troll armies becomes dangerously thin. For Lively, the stakes are her multi-million dollar brand and her standing as a Hollywood A-lister.
The use of subpoenas to uncover "social combat plans" highlights a new era of defense intelligence. In modern reputation warfare, the first 72 hours are critical. If a campaign is indeed being manufactured, the target must move beyond simple denials and into the realm of digital forensics to prove the lack of authenticity in the attacks.
Whether or not the allegations of astroturfing hold up in court, the damage to Lively’s corporate reputation management strategy is already done. The internet rarely waits for a verdict before passing judgment. This case serves as a warning to every executive and public figure: your biggest threat might not be a bad interview, but a coordinated smear campaign defense that you never saw coming.
How NegativePublicRelations.com would respond
How NegativePublicRelations.com would respond
In the Lively-Baldoni scenario, our firm would have initiated a multi-layered crisis reputation management protocol within the first hour of the "tone-deaf" narrative gaining traction. Our first step would be Detection and Attribution. Using our defense intelligence tools, we would analyze the metadata and posting patterns of the initial viral critiques to determine if they originated from authentic users or coordinated online troll armies.
If astroturfing was detected, we wouldn't wait for a subpoena. We would engage in Authoritative Counter-Publishing, leaking the evidence of the coordinated attack to friendly high-tier media outlets to flip the script—turning the "villain" into the victim of a shadowy smear campaign. Simultaneously, we would deploy ai-search-reputation-management to ensure that when users searched for the controversy, they were met with articles questioning the authenticity of the backlash rather than just the backlash itself.
Finally, we would implement reputation repair by flooding the digital ecosystem with positive, high-authority content that highlights the target's philanthropic work or professional achievements, effectively burying the negative noise. In the first 72 hours, the goal is to "break the signal" of the attack and introduce enough doubt to neutralize the momentum of the smear.
This post is based on reporting by ABC News. We rewrite and analyze the story; the original article remains the property of its publisher.
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's Hollywood feud allegedly involved a smear campaign and 'astroturfing'Facing a similar situation? Our reputation strategists can help.
Explore our smear campaign defense service
